Chuck Baldwin ... A Man Who Believes 
in the same Principles as Ron Paul

Learn more by reading His Speech after accepting the Constitution Party's Presidential Candidacy. Then visit the links below this message.

Friday, May 02, 2008

If I Were President
by Chuck Baldwin
May 2, 2008


Due to my frequent criticisms of President George W. Bush, I am often asked what I would do if I were President of these United States. This column will serve as an attempt to answer that question.

If I were President, I would begin the process of safely extracting our troops from Iraq. In the first place, our troops are no longer fighting a war, they are an occupation force, which occupies a sovereign country. And this is being done without a Declaration of War. The Iraqi people resent our occupation as much as we would resent another nation stronger than ours invading and occupying America. If such a thing happened to our beloved country, I'm sure many of us would also become "insurgents."

In the second place, the invasion and occupation of Iraq was absolutely unnecessary. Instead of sacrificing more than 4,000 American lives and the lives of tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens (not to mention some 2-3 trillion dollars), President Bush should have supported Ron Paul's bill, H.R. 3076, the September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001. This is the constitutional way to deal with rogue terrorist organizations. This is the way President Thomas Jefferson responded to the Barbary pirates.

According to Congressman Paul, "A letter of marque and reprisal is a constitutional tool specifically designed to give the President the authority to respond with appropriate force to those non-state actors who wage aggression against the United States while limiting his authority to only those responsible for the atrocities of that day. Such a limited authorization is consistent with the doctrine of just war and the practical aim of keeping Americans safe while minimizing the costs in blood and treasure of waging such an operation."

Had President Bush responded in this manner, tens of thousands of lives would have been saved, trillions of dollars would not have needed to be spent, Osama bin Laden and most of his fellow terrorists would likely be dead, and we would not be bogged down in a nightmarish military quagmire in Iraq. And, if I were President, this is exactly how I would handle terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda.

Furthermore, it is absolutely ludicrous to say we are fighting a war on terror half way around the world when we refuse to secure our borders and ports. If I were President, I would immediately seal our borders. I would also see to it that employers in America who knowingly hire illegal aliens are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. In plain language: any employer who consciously hires illegal aliens would go to jail. They would not pass Go; they would not collect $200; they would go straight to jail.

By sealing the borders and by cutting off the money supply to illegal aliens, the problem of illegal immigration would dry up. As it is, we have no idea how many potential terrorists--not to mention violent gang members such as MS-13--have snuck (and are sneaking) through our borders.

And speaking of illegal immigration, as President, I would enforce our visa rules. This means anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law is immediately deported. There would be no "path to citizenship" given to any illegal alien. That means no amnesty. Not in any shape, manner, or form. I would not allow tax dollars to be used to pay for illegal aliens' education, social services, or medical care. As President, I would end birthright citizenship for illegal aliens. There would be no "anchor babies" during my administration.

If I were President, I would use the bully pulpit of the White House to encourage Congress to pass Congressman Ron Paul's Sanctity of Life Act. In short, this bill would do two things: First, it would declare that unborn babies are persons under the law. Second, under the authority of Article. III. Section. 2. of the U.S. Constitution, it would remove abortion from the jurisdiction of the Court. In essence, this bill would immediately overturn Roe v. Wade and end legalized abortion.

Republicans tout themselves as being "pro-life." Yet, the GOP controlled both houses of Congress and the White House for six years and did absolutely nothing to overturn Roe or end abortion-on-demand. Under my administration, we could end legal abortion in a matter of days, not decades. And if Congress refused to pass Dr. Paul's bill, I would use the constitutional power of the Presidency to deny funds to protect abortion clinics. Either way, legalized abortion ends when I take office.

On the subject of foreign policy, as President, I would end foreign aid. I would also end the current infatuation with nation-building, empire-building, and interventionism. America is not the world's policeman. Neither are our military personnel the personal militia of the United Nations.

Remember that President Bush told the U.N. in 2003 that the reason we invaded Iraq was for the purpose of securing the "peace and credibility of the United Nations." (I lie not; that is what he said.) President Bush also placed the U.S. back under UNESCO in spite of the fact that President Reagan had heroically taken the U.S. out from under that sinister organization.

I am sure that readers recall that the U.N. Charter was authored by a Soviet communist agent (Alger Hiss) and that the U.S. has been fighting wars for the U.N. ever since the organization was created back in 1945.

Speaking of the United Nations, as President, I would withhold funds from the support of the United Nations. In other words, I would get the U.S. out of the U.N. Beyond that, when I move into the White House, the U.N.'s rent is up! They move out of New York City post haste.

By the same token, there is absolutely no reason for us to be in NATO. We should not be antagonizing Russia by attempting to expand NATO. There is no reason why Russia could not become a friend and ally of the United States. Free and fair trade with Russia and a noninterventionist foreign policy in Europe would do much to endear American interests to Russia. To insist on expanding and empowering NATO only serves to further alienate Russia and drive her to make alliances with Communist China.

Speaking of China, it is time that we recognize the very serious threat that China poses to the peace and security of the United States. Our trade practices serve only to allow corporate America to continue to invest in what will surely become an albatross around the neck of our well-being. We must discontinue the practice of allowing China to export its cheap products to the U.S. with no protection for America's jobs and manufacturing, not to mention the lack of protection for our safety. This must stop, and it will stop when I become President. "Free trade" will no longer mean a free ride for Red China.

Furthermore, as President, I would take the preservation of our nation's sovereignty and independence extremely seriously. This means that the burgeoning North American Union is dead on arrival the day I am sworn in as President. Gone, too, is the NAFTA superhighway. And for that matter, I would lead the United States out of NAFTA and CAFTA altogether. And any prospect for the FTAA would be dead as well.

As President, I would be the best friend that gun owners (and lawful gun dealers), homeschoolers, and veterans ever had in the White House. These are three of the most persecuted, harassed, or overlooked groups of people in the country. But not if I were President.

There is no reason why our veterans should wait for weeks and months to receive the medical care they need. It is disgraceful that we would ask our brave men and women of the U.S. armed forces to fight our country's battles and then leave them to pretty much fend for themselves when it comes to receiving adequate health care. I would make taking care of our veterans an extremely high priority, if I were President.

If I were President, I would also do everything in my power to locate and retrieve any and all MIAs. I personally believe that there are hundreds of our servicemen who are yet being held against their will in various parts of the world. I would make finding them and bringing them home of utmost priority, if I were President.

On the home front, if I were President, I would end corporate welfare. I would also work to disband the Department of Energy (along with the Department of Education and many other federal departments). There is absolutely no reason for us to be dependent upon OPEC. There is enough gas and oil under the soil of Alaska (not to mention the Dakotas and the Gulf of Mexico) to meet the energy needs of the United States for the next 150-200 years. There is also no reason that gas should cost more than $1.50 a gallon (which is about what it was before Bush became President).

We must begin drilling for the domestic oil that we know exists; we must build more refineries and nuclear power plants. There is no reason why the United States cannot be mostly energy independent. It is time we started putting the people and interests of the United States ahead of the CEOs and interests of international corporations.

Lastly, if I were President, I would work feverishly to overturn the Sixteenth Amendment, which would repeal the Income Tax. And, no, I would not promote a national sales tax. That would be disastrous! Can you imagine what a 30% sales tax would do to the cost of EVERYTHING? Plus, give politicians a national sales tax to increase and just imagine what kind of percent that would grow into!

I would also work to repeal the "death tax," inheritance taxes, and property taxes. The American people are already paying somewhere between 30% and 40% of their income to Uncle Sam. It must stop. We are bankrupting our country with this incessant and burdensome tax system. In addition, I would work to expunge the Federal Reserve and to restore the American economy to sound money.

Now, I hear people say, That's easy for you to say; you are not a candidate for President. Ah, but now I am.

Last week, in its national nominating convention in Kansas City, Missouri, the Constitution Party nominated me as its 2008 Presidential candidate. Party delegates nominated me over Ambassador Alan Keyes by a margin of 74% to 24%. Therefore, I am now a candidate for President of these United States.

See the CP website at http://www.constitutionparty.com

My Vice Presidential running mate is Darrell Castle, an attorney and Vietnam War Marine Corps veteran from Memphis, Tennessee.

Our web site is not online yet, but will be soon. We will be able to receive credit card donations when the web page is uploaded. The address of my campaign web site is: http://www.baldwin2008.com

In the meantime, if anyone wants to support our campaign, checks may be written to:

Baldwin 2008
P.O. Box 131
Palmyra, New Jersey 08065


I believe it is only fair, as I continue to write these columns, that one understands the full disclosure of my candidacy.
As readers know, I enthusiastically supported Ron Paul during the Republican Primary season. I plan to continue to trumpet his call for limited government, non-interventionism abroad, constitutional government, and freedom into the general election as a Third Party candidate.

I do not expect the national media to pay us much heed; they seldom do. I do not expect to receive large donations from corporate America. I do expect criticism and ridicule. That is nothing new. However, I also anticipate tens of thousands of freedom-loving people from all religious persuasions and walks of life to rally to our cause. Why? Because thousands of principled people will not be bullied into voting for the "evil of two lessers" being shoved down our throats by the two major parties. Because this campaign is not about Chuck Baldwin. It is not about a political party. It is about freedom. It is about constitutional government. It is about restoring America to the founding principles bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers. If you believe in those principles, join us!

In the meantime, these columns will continue to serve as a voice for America's founding principles, as they have for the past eight-plus years. In addition, unlike the candidates from the two major parties, the taxpayers are not underwriting my campaign, and I will continue my day job. (Imagine that: a Presidential candidate who actually works for a living!) And all of this is just in time for my 56th birthday, which is tomorrow, May 3.

There you have it: this is what I would do if I were President of these wonderful United States of America.

*If you enjoyed this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php © Chuck Baldwin

Archived at: http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2008/cbarchive_20080502.html 
 

More Links similar to Chuck Baldwin Live:

POST ELECTION RESPONSE EMAIL:

Conservatives Lost More Than An Election
By Chuck Baldwin
November 7, 2008


This column is archived at
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2008/cbarchive_20081107.html


That Barack Obama trounced John McCain last Tuesday should have surprised no
one. In fact, in this column, weeks ago, I stated emphatically that John
McCain could no more beat Barack Obama than Bob Dole could beat Bill
Clinton. He didn't. (Hence a vote for John McCain was a "wasted" vote, was
it not?) I also predicted that Obama would win with an electoral landslide.
He did. The real story, however, is not how Barack Obama defeated John
McCain. The real story is how John McCain defeated America's conservatives.
For all intents and purposes, conservatism--as a national movement--is
completely and thoroughly dead. Barack Obama did not destroy it, however. It
was George W. Bush and John McCain who destroyed conservatism in America.

Soon after G.W. Bush was elected, it quickly became obvious he was no
conservative. On the contrary, George Bush has forever established himself
as a Big-Government, warmongering, internationalist neocon. Making matters
worse was the way Bush presented himself as a conservative Christian. In
fact, Bush's portrayal of himself as a conservative Christian paved the way
for the betrayal and ultimate destruction of conservatism
(something I also
predicted years ago). And the greatest tragedy of this deception is the way
that Christian conservatives so thoroughly (and stupidly) swallowed the
whole Bush/McCain neocon agenda.

For example, Bush and his fellow neocons like to categorize and promote
themselves as being "pro-life," but they have no hesitation or reservation
about killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people in reckless and
unconstitutional foreign wars. By the same token, how many unborn babies
were saved by six years of all three branches of the federal government
being under the control of these "pro-life" neocons? Not one! Ask the more
than eight million unborn babies who were killed in their mothers' wombs
during the last eight years how "pro-life" George W. Bush and John McCain
are.

As a result of this insanely inconsistent and pixilated punditry, millions
of Americans now laugh at the very notion of "pro-life" conservatism. Bush
and McCain have made a mockery of the very term.

Consider, too, the way Bush and McCain have allowed the international
bankers on Wall Street to bilk America's taxpayers out of trillions of
dollars. Yes, I know Obama also supported the Wall Street bailout, but it
was the Republican Party that controlled the White House for the last eight
years and the entire federal government for six out of the last eight years.
In fact, the GOP has won seven out of the previous ten Presidential
elections. They have controlled Supreme Court appointments for the past
thirty-plus years. They have appointed the majority of Treasury secretaries
and Federal Reserve chairmen. They have presided over the greatest trade
imbalances, the biggest deficits, the biggest spending increases, and now
the worst financial disaster since the Great Depression.

Again, the American people look at these so-called "conservatives" and
laugh. No wonder such a sizeable majority of voters yawned when John McCain
tried to scare them by accusing Barack Obama of being a "big taxer." How can
one possibly scare people with a charge like that after the GOP has made a
total mockery of fiscal conservatism? That's like trying to scare someone
coming out from a swim in the Gulf of Mexico with a squirt gun.

Then there was the pathetic attempt by the National Rifle Association (NRA)
to scare gun owners regarding an Obama White House. Remember that John
McCain is the same guy that the NRA rightly condemned for proposing his
blatantly unconstitutional McCain/Feingold bill. McCain is also the same guy
that tried to close down gun shows. He even made a personal campaign
appearance for a pro-gun control liberal in the State of Oregon a few short
years ago. In fact, the Gun Owners of America (GOA) gave McCain a grade of
"F" for his dismal record on Second Amendment issues. Once again, Chicken
Little-style paranoia over Barack Obama rang hollow when the alternative was
someone as liberal as John McCain.

But the worst calamity of this election was the way
conservatives--especially Christian conservatives--surrendered their
principles for the sake of political partisanship. The James Dobsons of this
country should hang their heads in shame! Not only did they lose an
election, they lost their integrity!

In South Carolina, for example, pro-life Christians and conservatives had an
opportunity to vote for a principled conservative-constitutionalist for the
U.S. Senate. He is pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, and pro-traditional
marriage. He believes in securing our borders against illegal immigration.
He is against the bailout for the Wall Street banksters. His conservative
credentials are unassailable. But the vast majority of Christian
conservatives (including those at Bob Jones University) voted for his
liberal opponent instead.

The man that the vast majority of Christian conservatives voted for in South
Carolina is a Big-Government neocon. He supported the bailout of the Wall
Street banksters. He is a rabid supporter of granting amnesty and a pathway
to citizenship for illegal aliens. In fact, this man has a conservative
rating of only 29% in the current Freedom Index of the New American
Magazine.

Why did Christian conservatives support the liberal neocon and not the solid
pro-life conservative? Because the conservative ran as a Democrat and the
neocon is a Republican.
I'm talking about the race between Bob Conley and
Lindsey Graham, of course.

Had South Carolina's pastors, Christians, evangelicals, and pro-life
conservatives voted for Bob Conley, he would be the new senator-elect from
that state. In fact, Bob was so conservative that the Democratic leadership
in South Carolina endorsed the Republican, Lindsey Graham! No matter. A
majority of evangelical Christians in South Carolina stupidly rejected Bob
Conley and voted for Graham.

Across the country, rather than stand on principle, hundreds of thousands of
pastors, Christians, and pro-life conservatives capitulated and groveled
before John McCain's neocon agenda. In doing so, they forfeited any claim to
truth, and they abandoned any and all fidelity to constitutional government.
They should rip the stories of Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego out
of their Bibles. They should never again tell their children, parishioners,
and radio audiences the importance of standing for truth and principle. They
have made a mockery of Christian virtue. No wonder a majority of the voting
electorate laughs at us Christians. No wonder the GOP crashed and burned
last Tuesday.

Again, it wasn't Barack Obama who destroyed conservatism; it was George W.
Bush, John McCain, and the millions of evangelical Christians who supported
them. And until conservatives find their backbone and their convictions,
they deserve to remain a burnt-out, has-been political force. They have no
one to blame but themselves.

And since it is unlikely that the Republican Party has enough sense to
understand any of this and will, therefore, do little to reestablish genuine
conservative principles, it is probably best to just go ahead and bury the
scoundrels now and move on to something else. Without a sincere commitment
to constitutional government, the GOP has no justifiable reason to ever
govern again. Therefore, put a fork in them. They are done. Let a new entity
arise from the ashes: one that will stand for something more than just "the
lesser of two evils." As we say in the South, That dog just won't hunt
anymore.

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these
editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by
credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php

(c) Chuck Baldwin