Reproduced from the The Steamway Cleaning Scene, Fall '94, pages 1,6.

Research Conducted for the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Confirms the Value of Hot Water Extraction Carpet Cleaning In Improving Indoor Air Quality
As Part of a Total Environmental Management And Cleaning System

A recently conducted scientific study performed by the Research Triangle Institute in Chapel Hill North Carolina for the United States Environmental Protection Agency, was recently reported on as part of an effort to study the effect of cleaning on the quality of the indoor air in buildings. This study can be identified as follows:

Indoor Environment Characterization of A Non-Problem Building: Assessment Of Cleaning Effectiveness Prepared For:

United States Environmental Criteria And Assessment Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

EPA Cooperative Agreement CR-815509-02-1 RTI Project Number 94U-4479-014

Prepared By:

Research Triangle Institute P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2194

 

In some statements, the study is referred to as the Frank Porter Graham (FPG) study because the building used for the study was performed at the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Over the next few issues of the CLEANING SCENE, we will be reprinting, with permission, significant sections of this study. The following, reprinted with permission. is just part of the 202 page report on the findings of this study. The abstract defines the scope and purpose of the study.

 

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to characterize the indoor environment of a multi-floor, multiuse, non- problem, non-complaint building through long-term sampling for biological, chemical, and particulate pollutants: and to assess the effects of cleaning on indoor air quality. The study protocol included five months of "baseline" environmental measurements, a rigorous cleaning of the entire building; and, subsequently, seven months of environmental monitoring after implementation of an economically feasible, standard cleaning program. Air, surface, and dust data from monitoring prior to the cleaning program were compared with those obtained while the improved housekeeping program was in place to assess the effectiveness of the cleaning program on the indoor environment. Correlations between pollutants and other environmental factors are also presented. This work involved a collaborative effort by Research Triangle Institute, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), the building service contractor, and commercial cleaning and carpet industries, and their suppliers.

The study concluded that an organized cleaning program based upon environmental management principles and fundamental environmental protection guidelines contributed to improved indoor air quality through reduction of total suspended particles, total volatile organic compounds, and culturable bacteria and fungi. (Page iii in study)

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In an earlier study, the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) monitored for bio-aerosols, chemical and particles before and during carpet cleaning in commercial and residential environments (Cole and Foarde, 1992). Non-complaint environments were selected, although problems were found in two of the buildings. In general, the pollutant levels before and during carpet cleaning were related to the extent of routine cleaning in the building. As an extension of the research, the current study was established to better understand and assess the effectiveness of an economically-feasible, standard cleaning program to improve indoor air quality in a building, and to generate an extensive database characterizing anon- problem or "healthy" building environment. This study was planned and conducted with extensive collaboration among personnel from RTI, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, lead by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office with extensive involvement by the Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), the building service contractor, commercial cleaning and carpet industries, and their suppliers. This study represents an early example (which is being utilized with increasing frequency) of extensive government, not-for-profit organization, and industry collaboration, where industry representatives served on an advisory committee and provided technical guidance in selected areas of key importance to the success of the research.

After extensive protocol development by the many collaborators, the yearlong, environmental monitoring effort was performed at the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center (FPG) at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The Center is a multi-disciplinary, research effort led by pediatricians, psychologists, educators, and the health professionals who are studying the development of normal and handicapped preschool children. This 20 year old building has four floors and is approximately 2,700 m2, 66% of which is carpeted. There is a day care facility for 62 children, and 214 adults work with the day care and in the offices and laboratories of the building. Two full-time university housekeeping staffs are assigned to the building.

The environmental monitoring included bioaerosol sampling, non-floor surface biologicals, floor dust samples for mass and biologicals, aerosol particle counts, aerosol dust mass, volatile organic compounds, and comfort factors such as temperature, relative humidity, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. Initially (July 1992), the building was inspected, and an extensive environmental

  See the actual page by clicking the picture.

Col 2

During the course of the study, several unplanned "occurrences" were environmentally managed. They included a mold contaminated wall in a nursery area, flooding from plumbing and roof leaks, and smoke infiltration from neighborhood fires. When necessary, restoration was rapidly performed and each location was monitored to ensure the bio-pollution did not amplify. Thus, several unplanned "mini-studies" resulted and are described in various sections of the report.

Results of the study are compiled from detailed data in Section 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0 and are presented in Table 1. Key findings, conclusions, and research needs follow Table 1.

 before-ext.jpg (76709 bytes)Before Extraction 

after-ext.jpg (74363 bytes) After Extraction

wpe17.jpg (167350 bytes)See the actual page by clicking the picture.

SUMMARY OF MAJOR FINDINGS

Particle Results

Bio-pollutant Results of Data Comparison

Overall Results

(Pages v-x in study)